Skip to main content

In Response to the Economist's "King's Sad Men" By Yezan M Haddadin. New York, NY



Your reporting on Jordan cries out for criticism for its factual inaccuracy and the quality of its argument (“The king’s sad men” May 5th, 2012).  

Your article contains fundamental errors in its reporting on events in Jordan.  First, you report that the draft of the new election law limits single parties in the 138-member parliament to only five MPs when in fact such limitation applies only to representation in a 15-member proportionally‑assigned “national list”: single party candidates are free to contest, and gain control of, the remaining 123 seats.  Second, the new Prime Minister, Dr. Fayez Tarawneh, is not the King’s royal court chief as you report and has not served in such capacity for over a decade.  Third, far from being “paralyzed” by strikes, the phosphate and potash mines companies just reported robust growth in first quarter earnings (78% and 11%, respectively).  Finally, your framing of the country’s political narrative in terms of “Bedouin” vs. “Islamist” betrays a complete lack of understanding of Jordan’s unique social fabric (which includes Muslims and Christians, East Bank Jordanians as well as Palestinians, Circassians, Chechens, Armenians, Druze and Bahais) underlying its politics.  



Failure to check basic facts calls into question your analysis of the country’s recent political developments.  A number of important recent reforms (constitutional amendments that bestow greater powers on the legislative and judicial branches) are not even mentioned in your piece.  And changes in Prime Ministers are quite common in Jordan and pre-date the Arab Spring.  Strategically located in a turbulent region, the change in governments is sometimes determined by regional developments.  In a span of 14 months between 1956 and 1957, on the eve of a revolutionary explosion that swept the region, Jordan experienced no fewer than seven Prime Minister changes—and survived intact to witness an economic and social transformation unmatched by any Arab country.  Far from being a “careless” handling of the country’s affairs, as the Economist suggests, flexibility in changing governments is one element that has enabled Jordan to navigate a volatile region and preserve the country's peace and stability.  

Yezan M Haddadin, Esq. New York, NY

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

اهم التطورات العلمية في العام ٢٠١٩

10 things Dorothée Loorbach learned after losing a lot of money

Dorothée isn't just sharing her life changing experience with work and money, and sharing the following tips which won't make much sense without listening to the tips in her own words Money is important Money equals time Money equals value What people say doesn't matter What people say matters most when people is you! It's really simple - spend less, earn more, invest wisely and value yourself. It's not that easy Being broke sucks Stay Broke - be present in your own life Money isn't important https://youtu.be/_8l2egORXGA

Rules of war (in a nutshell)

https://youtu.be/HwpzzAefx9M Since the beginning, humans have resorted to violence as a way to settle disagreements. Yet through the ages, people from around the world have tried to limit the brutality of war. It was this humanitarian spirit that led to the First Geneva Convention of 1864, and to the birth of modern International Humanitarian Law. Setting the basic limits on how wars can be fought, these universal laws of war protect those not fighting, as well as those no longer able to. To do this, a distinction must always be made between who or what may be attacked, and who or what must be spared and protected.